RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe the organization of national drug regulatory authorities (DRAs) in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Peru through the analysis of categories representing organizational rules. METHODS: The DRAs were selected using the following criteria: being in a South American country, having been identified as DRAs at Encuentros de Autoridades Competentes en Medicamentos de los Países Iberoamericanos (Conferences of Ibero-American Drug Regulatory Authorities), and having good availability of electronic data regarding organizational structure and the process of drug regulation. The main source of data were websites, which were reviewed between May 2010 and March 2011. The analytical categories were: organizational structure, competencies, directionality (mission and vision statements), and forms of accountability. RESULTS: The DRAs of Argentina and Brazil functioned as autonomous agencies, while those of Chile and Peru were directly subordinated to the ministries of health. Except for the Brazilian DRA, the agencies in the other three countries were dependent on their health ministries to issue sanitary regulations. The scope of action of each DRA differed in terms of the goods and services covered, with the Peruvian DRA being the only one exclusively dedicated to the regulation of drugs. The four DRAs performed all the processes identified by the World Health Organization as essential for effective drug regulation. CONCLUSIONS: The results show an effort by the studied countries to improve their regulatory structure. Nevertheless, all four DRAs need to improve some mechanisms to ensure that, at the end of the regulatory chain, the drugs they regulate have the desired quality and safety, with more transparency in decision-making processes and social accountability.
Assuntos
Controle de Medicamentos e Entorpecentes/organização & administração , Países em Desenvolvimento , Aprovação de Drogas/organização & administração , Serviços de Informação sobre Medicamentos/organização & administração , Órgãos Governamentais/organização & administração , Legislação de Medicamentos , Responsabilidade Social , América do Sul , Organização Mundial da SaúdeRESUMO
OBJETIVO: Descrever a organização das autoridades reguladoras nacionais (ARN) de medicamentos da Argentina, Brasil, Chile e Peru pela análise de categorias representativas de regras organizacionais. MÉTODOS: As ARN estudadas foram selecionadas utilizando-se os seguintes critérios: estar em país da América do Sul, ter sido identificada como ARN nos Encuentros de Autoridades Competentes en Medicamentos de los Países Iberoamericanos e apresentar boa disponibilidade de dados eletrônicos sobre estrutura e processo da regulação de medicamentos. Como principal fonte de dados, foram consultadas páginas eletrônicas entre maio de 2010 e março de 2011. As categorias analíticas foram: estrutura da organização, competências, direcionalidade e formas de responsabilidade e prestação de contas. RESULTADOS: As ARN da Argentina e do Brasil funcionavam como agências autônomas, enquanto que as do Chile e do Peru se subordinavam diretamente aos respectivos ministérios da saúde. À exceção da ARN brasileira, evidenciou-se a dependência das demais em relação ao ministério para emitir normas sanitárias. O escopo de ação de cada autoridade se diferenciou pelos bens e serviços a ela sujeitos, sendo a do Peru a única dedicada exclusivamente à regulação de medicamentos. As quatro ARN realizam todos os processos apontadas pela Organização Mundial da Saúde como essenciais para uma regulação efetiva. CONCLUSÕES: Os resultados apontam para um esforço dos países estudados em melhorar sua estrutura regulatória. Não obstante, em diversos aspectos, as quatro ARN ainda precisam aprimorar mecanismos para garantir, ao final da cadeia regulatória, a qualidade e a segurança dos medicamentos por elas regulados, com mais transparência nos processos decisórios e prestação de contas à sociedade.
OBJECTIVE: To describe the organization of national drug regulatory authorities (DRAs) in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, and Peru through the analysis of categories representing organizational rules. METHODS: The DRAs were selected using the following criteria: being in a South American country, having been identified as DRAs at Encuentros de Autoridades Competentes en Medicamentos de los Países Iberoamericanos (Conferences of Ibero-American Drug Regulatory Authorities), and having good availability of electronic data regarding organizational structure and the process of drug regulation. The main source of data were websites, which were reviewed between May 2010 and March 2011. The analytical categories were: organizational structure, competencies, directionality (mission and vision statements), and forms of accountability. RESULTS: The DRAs of Argentina and Brazil functioned as autonomous agencies, while those of Chile and Peru were directly subordinated to the ministries of health. Except for the Brazilian DRA, the agencies in the other three countries were dependent on their health ministries to issue sanitary regulations. The scope of action of each DRA differed in terms of the goods and services covered, with the Peruvian DRA being the only one exclusively dedicated to the regulation of drugs. The four DRAs performed all the processes identified by the World Health Organization as essential for effective drug regulation. CONCLUSIONS: The results show an effort by the studied countries to improve their regulatory structure. Nevertheless, all four DRAs need to improve some mechanisms to ensure that, at the end of the regulatory chain, the drugs they regulate have the desired quality and safety, with more transparency in decision-making processes and social accountability.
